Schopenhauer Analysis

Joon contend Ms. Love A. P. Language &038 Composition 17 February 2010 O. C. E. 1 Schopenhauers Assumption In terms of the human read/write head, we atomic number 18 before long unable to make definite statements as to how it functions and what factors affect its education. Arthur Schopenhauer was a man who believed that to shoot hands was to limit self-thinking. In rung, he believed that constricting self-thinking was to limit any chances of set forthing ones scholarship. However, the influences written down in march sheets of paper ar none contrastive from influences of the environment and the cosmea in general.Schopenhauer states that if a man does not want to think, the safest contrive is to take up a phonograph record directly when he has a trim moment. neverthe slight, it is interesting to consider that to flat ferment words on a knave requires some workout of the take care. People do not inherently accept each mood and proposition thrown at them when reading a book. They take the idea and process it, whether they end up agreeing or disagreeing with the idea. It is this process of curtilageing that books invoke upon a person.Books do not tend to champion easy, acceptable ideas to spate books represent the force field to philosophize, reason, and expose oneself to the unique and infinite ideas of the world. Schopenhauers biggest f totallyacy is his belief that the human mind is a mindless machine, taking in in giveation without any consideration and summary of the information. However, the primary function of a book is to force a reader to kinda a littlevass the ideas it has to darker. If everyone were to accept all the various ideas go in our worlds library, then(prenominal) there would be no earth for debate and no conflicting ideas.Yet there are debates and there are arguments. The analysis of the ideas present in books chip in to agreement, disagreement, and neutrality. Nonetheless, the reader rests upon a conclu sion by and by the process of abstract thought and logic. Linda Elder and Richard capital of Minnesota once pointed out, One cannot be an educated person without consistently learning done reading. (Elder and Paul). This learning is from the process of constantly analyzing and process ideas throughout the bound pages of information.As the mind is presented with new ideas, it strives to comprehend and build off of those ideas, adapting and changing its way of thinking constantly. A book can be belief of as a supplier of the sensitive and bare thoughts of the world. They do not specifically appeal to any of the five senses and thus, forces our minds to discipline by imagining those senses. A movie, on the new(prenominal) hand, gives us visuals and sounds that feed specific emotions and thoughts to the interview. The audience sees and hears what the director specifically wants him/her to see and hear. in that location is no room for creativity.There is no room for individuali ty to seep in. In fact, most would argue that movies are emergence to have detrimental effects upon people in society. The political cartoon Hollywood Trash by Jerry Seltzer displays a boy organism make full with the scum that Hollywood is dumping into him. This represents the state of foolhardiness one adapts when absorbing the content in a movie. Because the mind is being spoon-fed ideas, it becomes reliant on the crutches that limit the senses and imagination. In a book, no direct image is being fed. Sounds are obsolete as healthy as physical touch.The only stem of feed the reader has is the words on the pages. For example, when a reader sees the word blue, everything from the marine to the color shirt they were wearing the different day fills his/her mind. Past memories, experiences, and events are all triggered by this word and culminate to form an expanse of images with no limits. This alone can stand as a reason why books force people to use their minds. It is at the level of sub consciousness. To even comprehend words on a page, the mind is brought to work at salutary gear, providing the images, sounds, feel, smell, and tastes that bring the book to life.In retrospect, we as humans are influenced by everything in existence. Whether we formulate original ideas or estimate the ideas of others is regardless in our path of achieving companionship and information. Our current world today is filled with advertisements and a growing population of electronics and stylized senses. That means that we are finding less use for our natural senses and imagination when we depend for forms of entertainment. Schopenhauer says to find our natural influence and to evoke our thinking using the world somewhat us.Unfortunately, the world around us is quite possibly a thousand clock worse than the very books he is toilsome to denounce. Our minds are filled with influences and daily toss from entertainment businesses such as Hollywood. They are being fed the knowledge of the world rather than being forced to flow for it. So perhaps it is preferable to turn back to the detrimental books and seek to disperse our intelligence there. After all, the true learning readers inherit from books lies not in the tangible information and ideas, but from the resulting process of reasoning and analysis of those ideas.We are not, as Schopenhauer expresses, poor fish from learning. For it isnt the feed of information from books that rusts our intelligence on the contrary, it is our ability to respond and expand upon our learning that solidifies our knowledge and builds a found for our intellect to prosper. BIBLIOGRAPHY Lolita in Tehran, Gatsby Paul, Richard, Elder, Linda, Critical thought process and the Art of Close Reading (Part I). diary of Developmental Education 27 no. 2 36-7, 39 Wint. 2003 Seltzer, Jerry. Hollywood Trash. www. ParentsTV. org