A Critique of “Don’t Blame the Eater”

I couldnt open up a magazine, you couldnt read a newspaper, you couldnt turn on the TV without hearing near the fleshiness epidemic in America. is a quote by Morgan Spurlock, that astutely describes the obesity problem dismissal on in America. Any appearance one sens ask to talk some the problem, it will continuously be a huge dilemma throughout the United States. For a long time now, mint have been discussing who is to consign for the obesity crisis going on.Some people prefer to whack the judicature, several blame the restaurants, others the p atomic number 18nts and even the schools hold criticism for obesity. People should develop their witness ideas on the obesity crisis and to guess out who is to blame and how to fix the problem. The main denomination I indispensability to focus on is Dont Blame the Eater by David Zinczenko. Throughout this article, he refers to the few kids suing McDonalds and other spendthrift pabulum restaurants.According to the book, T hey posit, I assign, there are two major parts of an article, the They grade, and the I Say. From Zinczenkos point of view, he was biased towards the side saying that the nutriment restaurants is trustworthy for the obesity crisis, temporary hookup the others he is writing against, are writing rough ad hominem responsibility and how to teach the world how to be self-empowered and control what they eat. Others compile intimately the g everywherenment flailing around, non doing anything to stop and fix the obesity crisis.Zinczenko focuses on the fast food restaurants are causing e very(prenominal) of the problems, because their advertisements are think to children, (The Happy Meal by McDonalds) and teenagers, by having cheap carb filled food for the average poor teenager and college student. Throughout his article, he do umpteen valid points as to why the restaurants are to blame for obesity. The restaurants create a very difficult flair to tell exactly what you are ea ting, mainly because there are no calorie information on the food you waste ones time in these eateries.This is mainly because the FDA does not cover prepared give in each(prenominal) restaurants, especially fast food restaurants, where it is motivatinged the most. An archetype he gives is that is that a website says a chicken salad contains 150 calories, the almonds and noodles it comes with is an additional one hundred ninety calories, a 280 calorie dressing, hardly the dressing is 2. 5 servings. That total is 1,400 unless that excludes anything else you might get, like a coke or fries. (Zinczenko 393) He as well gives statistics that show how Type 2 diabetes has increased 25% since 1994. (Zinczenko 392) After all of the points he has shown, he came up with a solution to solve this risis, And Id say the industry is vulnerable. Fast-companies are marketing to children a reaping with proven health hazards and no warning labels. They would do well to cling to themselves, and their customers, by providing the nutrition information people need (Zinczenko 393) This is one way that we can start to work with the restaurants to solve this problem. Although he brought up very good points, his argument was very biased against fast food restaurants. During the article he mentioned that we should be responsible for our actions, such as Whatever happened to personal responsibility? (Zinczenko 391) and Shouldnt you know better than to eat two meals a day in fast-food restaurants? (Zinczenko 392) He did not display both sides equally, or even bring up the other side, not contributing the They Say of his article. Other than those two quotes, he does not talk about others to blame or any other solutions to this crisis. Another part of the article that tangled me was the part where Zinczenko told his story about how in high school, he was 210lbs. with a lanky 510 body frame. According to the article, he conjugate the Navy Reserve in college, lost all the weight by working out, and alsok responsibility for himself. Zinczenko 391)Even though he uses this story in which he took responsibility for himself, he still blames the fast food restaurants and barely scratches the rally of self-responsibility. Another article about obesity is What You Eat is Your Business by Radley Balko, but it has a different approach then the way Zinczenko had used. Balko believes that the administration needs to leave the public be, and promote personal responsibility. He says that politicians are joining the fight, President Bush earmarked $200 million in his figure for anti-obesity measures. (Balko 396) Those two hundred million dollars could have been spent on a good deal more important things, like helping people with more overserious problems. Throughout Balkos article he supports the idea the people need to take responsibility for their own actions, such as becoming obese. Balko says It moreover becomes a public matter when we force the public to earn ings for the consequences of those choices. (Balko 397) When the people who carry on fit and control their own weight have to pay for those who do not stay fit and become obese is when this becomes a large debate.He continues on to discuss how easy it is to get health benefits while obese, such as not having an extra fee for people over a certain weight and Your heart attack drives up the speak to of my premiums and office visits. And if the government is paying for my anti-cholesterol medication, what incentive is there for me to put polish up the cheeseburger? (Balko 396-7) The United States do not give any sort of claim for being in shape, so why not just get fat and enjoy life. A third author who has written about the obesity crisis is Judith Warner, with her article Junking Junk Food. All through her article, she pokes fun at the government giving different stories about how individual people are trying to fight the ways that the government is trying to deal with the obes ity crisis. She starts the article off by telling a story about Sarah Palin bring a bunch of cookies to the schoolchildren to try to stop the high-minded anti- scratching edict. She made a few mistakes about the whole set up, such as Pennsylvania was not in a debate against sugar in their public schools, and the school she showed up to with her cookies was a private Christian Academy. Warner 400) disrespect the miscommunications that happened there, Palins message traveled straight to the American heart, she had come up with new and vivid imagery to specify the case that the Obama nanny cite is, essentially, snatching cookies i. e. , the pursuit of happiness from the mouths of babes. Suddenly, any kind of attack on sugar or some sort of rosy-cheeked sweet became an attack on the American way of life. (Warner 401) Glenn Beck is also fighting the governments intentions, by creating a compendium that includes, Reports of government health inspectors shutting down a 7-year-olds lemonade stand. According to Warner, the choice architects of the Obama Administration believe that youre incompetent of making decisions . Left to your own devices, youre going to eat too much, youre going to be a big fatty. (Warner 401) According to Beck and Warner, the government has no faith in us, so it views itself as needing to intervene. My own ideas of this melodic theme lean towards Balkos point of view, that we essential become responsible for our own bodies. I do agree with Zinczenko up to a point that the fast food restaurants are partly to blame, but not all of the blame can be sent to them.And I do agree with Warner up to a point as well, we cannot leave ourselves in the governments hands, we have to take responsibility. We, as a country, must work in concert with the fast food restaurants and the government to stop obesity right in its tracks. There are other ways to stop this crisis that are not mentioned anywhere in the article, such as teaching children to cook healthy foods and exercise using such things as a nutrition soma to teach the students to be responsible for themselves.We have to try to distract the children out from computer games and television to get them to play outside and get their passing(a) amount of exercise. Others would point blame to the parents, for if the parents put in the effort with their children, and unplowed an eye on what they eat, and how often they go outside to play, can make a large difference throughout a childs life. Zinczenko argued that as a teenager, he only had four or cardinal places for him to eat around his house, but where were his parents at the time.No parent would ever want their son or daughter to be obese, so we need to permit the parents know how bad fast food can be if that is all you eat. My goal here was to help you decide which group of people do you blame for the crisis, and how do you think it can be stopped. My answer is that we must influence ourselves to become responsible f or ourselves, to help us want to stay physically fit and healthy. We cannot rely on any power, such as the government, or lay blame on the restaurants, such as McDonalds, but take responsibility into our own hands. Which choice would you pick, and do you think you can make a difference?Works Cited Balko, Radley. What You Eat Is Your Business They Say/ I Say with Readings. 2nd. Ed. Gerald Graff, Cathy Birkenstein and Russel Durst. New York W. W. Norton, 2012. 395- 8. Warner, Judith. Junking Junk Foods. They Say/ I Say with Readings. 2nd ed. Ed. Gerald Graff, Cathy Birkenstein and Russel Durst. New York W. W. Norton, 2012. 400-4. Zinczenko, David. Dont Blame the Eater. They Say/ I Say with Readings. 2nd ed. Ed. Gerald Graff, Cathy Birkenstein and Russel Durst. New York W. W. Norton, 2012. 391-3.