'Morality without religious belief is impossible Essay\r'

'Many would agree with the statement that pietism without spiritual belief is impossible, because pietisms provide an unchanging lesson code whereas secular moralisticity varies depending on rescript and culture. Documents such as the Decalogue transcend time, notwithstanding constitutions and laws of objet dart are constantly being amended and reviewed. ethics without God is merely subjective; two concourse will have different ideas on what is to be considered moral. This will only lead to confusion. For example, some cultures at present still regard the beating of wives and children to be moral even though our western society would disagree. Without a religious standard, who is to place we hold the correct credence?\r\nIt is worth noting that majority of people that are revere for their good works and ethics are religious, such as Mother Theresa and the Dali Lama. Correspondingly, some of the most notorious criminals such as Hitler and Stalin were staunch atheists à ¢â‚¬ this is not to say that all atheists are on the level of these men, but it is evident that when a society attempts to crush religion rampant im faith will soon follow. You nookienot olfaction to a leader of a country for your ethical motive because they are fallible humans equitable equivalent you. You need a perfect standard to determine up to: God. Atheists lack this perfect standard to tooshie their godliness off.\r\nOn the other hand, many would trust that you butt end be moral without a religious belief. In Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs, he states that morality can be achieved once five canonical conditions are met: food water, shelter, homeostasis and sex. Religion is not unrivalled of his points. Additionally, atheists have a conscience. They feel guilt just like a religious soul would when they do maltreat. Even the smallest child knows that certain actions are wrong without any taking into custody of religion. This suggests that an adult’s mor ality could owe more to upbringing than religious understanding; this would explain why standards of morality vary mingled with people.\r\nMoreover, religions have been known to cause vast immorality. An early example of this would be the Crusades, when Christians butchered Muslims in the name of religion. A more modern example would be the insurrection of Islamic extremism, causing incidents such as 9/11 and the 7/7 bombings. If religions are conjectural to inspire morality, why do they cause so much harm and bloodshed? Finally, morality can be achieved through legal means. Human laws nix us from harming ourselves or others through our actions. An atheist can follow these laws and be a good person without religious beliefs.\r\n'